<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.titleist.com.au/teamtitleist/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>TT DGTour Issue X100 softstepped vs. TTDGTour Issue S400 hardstepped</title><link>https://www.titleist.com.au/teamtitleist/team-titleist/f/golf-clubs/32687/tt-dgtour-issue-x100-softstepped-vs-ttdgtour-issue-s400-hardstepped</link><description> I am going to order a set of 716AP2 irons 3-pw. Stuck between having them shafted either X100 softstepped (1x) or S400 hardstepped (1x). Going with TT Dynamic Gold Tour Issue shafts either way. I have played in the past the 714 MB with TT DGTI X100 shafted</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: TT DGTour Issue X100 softstepped vs. TTDGTour Issue S400 hardstepped</title><link>https://www.titleist.com.au/teamtitleist/thread/156969?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2016 04:52:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9ab519fc-5311-4952-85cd-0a0ceffb73fb:6f63d066-1a90-44ed-a297-4daaa9c62c5e</guid><dc:creator>David M. -Team Titleist ANZ Manager</dc:creator><description>Hoganesque,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In answer to your Q - I&amp;#39;ve done both ie. soft-stepped the DG X100&amp;#39;s and hard stepped the DG S400&amp;#39;s in my MB&amp;#39;s and AP2&amp;#39;s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I found in both sets that I tried it, the soft stepped X100&amp;#39;s played (and felt) better in the 3-6 irons - mainly because the X100 is a lighter shaft than the S400. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However the 7-PW came out too low with the X100&amp;#39;s soft stepped, and they felt very stiff with the hard stepped S400&amp;#39;s in them,  so I ended up going with standard S400 in the shorter irons both times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However I&amp;#39;ve since found the new TT AMT shaft has almost eliminated the need for any shaft &amp;quot;stepping&amp;quot;.  The whole reason I tried &amp;#39;soft steppping&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;hard stepping&amp;#39; my shafts was for feel- not flex as there was virtually no noticeable performance (flight) difference between a hard stepped S400 and soft stepped X100.  The AMT shaft has completely taken out the guesswork.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So If you are in between S400 and X100 in Dynamic Gold and you want a heavier club - go with the S400 Tour Issue AMT straight up and if you want it slightly lighter then go with the X100&amp;#39;s in the Tour Issue AMT.  No need to soft or hard step the AMT.  You&amp;#39;ll find the feel is great in the longer irons with the AMT and almost the same as before with Dynamic Gold in the shorter irons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hope that helps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dave&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TT DGTour Issue X100 softstepped vs. TTDGTour Issue S400 hardstepped</title><link>https://www.titleist.com.au/teamtitleist/thread/156910?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:27:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9ab519fc-5311-4952-85cd-0a0ceffb73fb:554554ab-10b9-4b6a-b7a9-4e853b7d37b3</guid><dc:creator>Bryan M</dc:creator><description>Small difference in weight between the two.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TT DGTour Issue X100 softstepped vs. TTDGTour Issue S400 hardstepped</title><link>https://www.titleist.com.au/teamtitleist/thread/156896?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:23:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9ab519fc-5311-4952-85cd-0a0ceffb73fb:e6438394-e369-462e-94b2-ccf641fdb0d2</guid><dc:creator>Trevor D</dc:creator><description>Golf WRX has explored this extensively. Have a read:&lt;a href="http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/448666-dg-s400-vs-x100/"&gt;www.golfwrx.com/.../&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>